Loading...

Daily Show

De-Douching America

by tomtenney on August 2, 2009

Repost: originally posted on inc.ongruo.us

This weekend, I’m catching up on my Daily Shows & Colbert Reports that I missed while in SF. I just watched Wednesday’s Daily Show, and was blown away by “So You Think You Can Douche”, taking on the talking heads on cable news networks. It’s not that it was so much better than the typical Daily Show bit, but just that it seemed to encapsulate perfectly the ways in which TDS is an essential corrective to today’s media.

The segment made me think of Duchamp’s prediction that “the artist of the future will simply point his finger.” Although comically brilliant, there’s actually very little “comedy” writing in this piece…. it is its own absurdity that make it art. Stewart is simply putting a frame around the everyday, and pointing to our complacency (and complicity) with media that resorts to audio/visual stimuli and rhetorical tricks to subvert reason and present us with a version of reality that is almost Pirandellian.

What is Stewart pointing to, exactly?

* Hannity’s use of edit room technology to subvert reason and appeal directly to the emotions – exactly what news is NOT supposed to do. After showing Hannity’s montage of seemingly random Obama sound bites set to menacing background music, Stewart points out, simply: “That made no sense. Yet, still, for some reason I am angry and afraid. It’s as though anything you set to grainy footage and the soundtrack of The Omen seems menacing.” He then presents clips from “Dora the Explorer” with the same production trickery. Point made.

* He brilliantly deconstructs the language Lou Dobbs uses for the way it makes political inferences while disguised as unbiased reporting.

* Glenn Beck’s overt hypocrisy in saying Obama has “a deep-seated hatred for white people“, followed literally a minute later by the statement, “I’m not saying that he doesn’t like white people“. It seems almost too easy – yet Beck seems to be relying on the short attention spans and unwillingness of most Americans to actually THINK about the stories they are told. In this way, Stewart implicates all Americans in the douchery.

THIS is exactly why the Daily Show IS news, not “fake news.” My Oxford Dictionary defines “news” as:

“newly received or noteworthy information, esp. about recent or important events”

If we accept this definition, then certainly exposing the way the media twists the day’s events into propaganda is NEWS in and of itself – but who reports news on the news? Media CANNOT be exempt from the “events” that news is supposed to place under the microscope of critical examination. But isn’t it entertainment? Absolutely. But in this case, it’s not only that it informs AND makes us laugh (the “hybrid” model), it informs precisely BECAUSE it makes us laugh (an integral model?). By exposing the absurdity, it informs. If we don’t laugh, if we don’t “get it”, then we have not been informed.

I’ve said enough. Just watch the clip… it’s amazing.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
So You Think You Can Douche
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Joke of the Day
Share

{ 0 comments }

Midterm paper for the class: Fake News, Politics and Popular Culture; Spring 2009

On the November 5th, the day after Barack Obama won the 2008 presidential election, Jon Stewart asked his audience on The Daily Show “How are we gonna make this shit funny?”  Stewart stepped into the role of host of the show in 1999, the tail end of the Clinton administration, but for the past 8 years, he has come into his own as a satirist, media critic and political commentator, largely due to his skill at poking fun at, and poking holes through, the often-absurd policies of the Republican administration of President George W. Bush. While Jon Stewart has himself stated that The Daily Show doesn’t represent the left or right, but “the distracted center” (Jones 114), it can hardly be denied that for the past 8 years, Republicans have given Stewart and his writers a wealth of material on which, it could be argued, the success of the show has been built.  With a liberal democrat now in the White House, will Stewart and his writers modify their tactics in order to maintain the reputation and status they have gained as our culture’s scathingly honest purveyors of political critique?

Before attempting to answer this question, I will first examine the rise of new political late night television, especially The Daily Show, and its role in providing a public mouthpiece that speaks “truth to power”.  I will then look closely at how it accomplishes this through the use of parody as tool of political and social critique.  My aim is to show that it has been well established that The Daily Show speaks truth to power before presenting my research, which will examine whether and how this may have changed since the inauguration of Barack Obama. [continue reading this post...]

Share

{ 0 comments }